Stein, M. K., Remillard, J., & Smith, M. S. (2007). How curriculum influences student learning. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing. [PDF]
Of particular importance are "Section Two: How Teachers Engage With and Interpret Curriculum Materials" (pp 340-346), the "Educative Curriculum" subsection (pp 357-358), and the last two paragraphs of the chapter (pp 362-363).
Lloyd, G. (2002). Mathematics teachers' beliefs and experiences with innovative curriculum materials: The role of curriculum in teacher development. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Torner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education (pp. 149-159). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. [PDF]
Davis, E., & Krajcik, J. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Education Researcher, 34(3), 3-14. [PDF]
Bob Floden & Mary Kay Stein (ppt file) ExCITE conference presentations
National Academy of Education website (briefing sheets available for download) - http://www.naeducation.org/
There is a Wisconsin Center for Education Research survey involving 20 states of the enacted curriculum. Here is a link: http://seconline.wceruw.org/ There are A LOT of resources on this site. I've attached the survey they used for K-12 mathematics, but there are also quite a bit of data presented on the site. K12mthSurvey.pdf
Ball & Cohen (1996). An article from ER on the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform. [PDF]
Brown, M. (2004). Toward a theory of curricular design and use. Unpublished AERA paper. [PDF] Matt Brown's broader work was referenced by Mark Kay with regard to "pedagogical design capacity."
Drake, C., & Sherin, M.G. (2006). Practicing change: Curriculum adaptation and teacher narrative in the context of mathematics education reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36, 153-187. [PDF] This work was referenced by Janine Remillardwith regard to "curriculum capacity", during the discussion session of the mathematical knowledge for teaching AKA capacity for teaching group.
Lloyd (2006). This short piece from an AMTE monograph discusses ways in which curriculum can be used with preservice teachers. [PDF]
Lloyd & Behm (2005). An article about preservice teachers, published in Action in Teacher Education. [PDF]
Putnam, R. P. (1987). Work on curriculum scripts (published in AERJ), which came up in the context/resources small-group. [PDF]
Remillard, J. T. (2000). Can curriculum materials support teachers' learning? Two fourth-grade teachers' use of a new mathematics text. The Elementary School Journal, 100(4), 331-350. [PDF]
Remillard, J. T., & Bryans, M. B. (2004). Teachers' orientations toward mathematics curriculum materials: Implications for teacher learning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(5), 352-388. [PDF]
Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4-13. [PDF] Related to Mark Kay's comments about reconceptualizing teacher knowledge in a more dynamic, situated way.
Stylianides, G. J. (2008). Investigating the guidance offered to teachers in curriculum materials: The case of proof in mathematics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6, 191-215. [PDF]
Tarr, Reys, Reys, Chavez, Shih, & Osterlind. (2008). The impact of middle grades mathematics curricula and the learning environment on student achievement. JRME. [PDF]
Primary Resources/References
Conference Agenda [PDF] [Webpage]
ExCITE Conceptual Framework [PDF]
Stein, M. K., Remillard, J., & Smith, M. S. (2007). How curriculum influences student learning. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing. [PDF]
Lloyd, G. (2002). Mathematics teachers' beliefs and experiences with innovative curriculum materials: The role of curriculum in teacher development. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Torner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education (pp. 149-159). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. [PDF]
Davis, E., & Krajcik, J. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Education Researcher, 34(3), 3-14. [PDF]
Research framework from Janine and Ralph:
Other Resources/References
Feel free to "Edit This Page" and upload any references you want to share. (To upload a file, use theGwen's website on curriculum use - http://www.math.vt.edu/people/lloyd/curriculum/
National Academy of Education website (briefing sheets available for download) - http://www.naeducation.org/
Ball & Cohen (1996). An article from ER on the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform. [PDF]
Brown, M. (2004). Toward a theory of curricular design and use. Unpublished AERA paper. [PDF]
Matt Brown's broader work was referenced by Mark Kay with regard to "pedagogical design capacity."
Drake, C., & Sherin, M.G. (2006). Practicing change: Curriculum adaptation and teacher narrative in the context of mathematics education reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36, 153-187. [PDF]
This work was referenced by Janine Remillard with regard to "curriculum capacity", during the discussion session of the mathematical knowledge for teaching AKA capacity for teaching group.
Lloyd (2006). This short piece from an AMTE monograph discusses ways in which curriculum can be used with preservice teachers. [PDF]
Lloyd & Behm (2005). An article about preservice teachers, published in Action in Teacher Education. [PDF]
MT21 Report (teacher education). [PDF]
Putnam, R. P. (1987). Work on curriculum scripts (published in AERJ), which came up in the context/resources small-group. [PDF]
Remillard, J. T. (2000). Can curriculum materials support teachers' learning? Two fourth-grade teachers' use of a new mathematics text. The Elementary School Journal, 100(4), 331-350. [PDF]
Remillard, J. T., & Bryans, M. B. (2004). Teachers' orientations toward mathematics curriculum materials: Implications for teacher learning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(5), 352-388. [PDF]
Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4-13. [PDF]
Related to Mark Kay's comments about reconceptualizing teacher knowledge in a more dynamic, situated way.
Stylianides, G. J. (2008). Investigating the guidance offered to teachers in curriculum materials: The case of proof in mathematics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6, 191-215. [PDF]
Tarr, Reys, Reys, Chavez, Shih, & Osterlind. (2008). The impact of middle grades mathematics curricula and the learning environment on student achievement. JRME. [PDF]